Where do we live? Where do we work? Where are the people that are needed going to work?
There is a generational changing of the guard coming. The jobs that existed during my parents and my generations’ are changing. For example, there is less need for people in my field, accounting and finance, than there was three decades ago when I joined the profession. (In the states, there are both less need in general in the world, and much has been outsourced.)
My friends that are journalists, musicians, professors, are all finding jobs scarce.
That is the current and continuing job/economic trend. Declining employment needs is the norm. The trends of productivity from technology and effects of globalization continue. Neither trend is completed yet.
The effects are less value-added activity needed and conducted domestically, more automation, less jobs needed, global competition and specialization, outsourcing, high fixed costs of doing business (land, rent, power, administrative regulation, oligopolies with fierce competitive advantage in existing fields), high labor burden costs of doing business (health insurance, workers’ comp, litigious society), and some effect of high variable costs of doing business (volatile commodity prices, volatile demand, increasing taxes).
In the economy as a whole, the concerns about the decline of productivity and increase in services for the baby boomer bulge (talkin about my generation) are coming due. The fear is that there won’t be an economy to keep enough young people employed to actually contribute to prospective social security payout needs. Wages and salaries aren’t currently rising, and the number of jobs aren’t rising, but the prospective draw on those funds will be certainly.
Thats more of the same trend, coming home to roost.
But, that fearful analysis ignores another factor of the generational shift. That is that in the course of the next decade or two there will also be massive (literally) waves of retirement in fields that NEED to replenish. There is a permanent and unavoidable need for teachers, for business administrators, for government employees, for food manufacture/distribution, for trades, for banking, for culture, for transportation services, for energy services.
While it is hard now for individuals in their 50’s to find work, in five years it will be less so. While now there is a discontinuity between the number of jobs available for 50 – 60 year olds, compared to expectations of later retirement age, that will gradually, then abruptly change, leaving employment available until for whomever wishes to retire later than our parents for example.
Ironically, we will likely see NEW 65 year-old teachers, nurses, etc.
The employment prospects for younger people, new graduates, will also improve. (Who will mentor them is a different question). While those graduating this year or next face a very frustrating job search, those graduating from college and/or graduate school in five years will face a challenging world, but better job prospects than curretly (unless the economy totally tanks).
The aspect that will be difficult is how will rural and currently depressed communities recruit the young and/or old employees that they will need?
Currently, in rural Vermont, New Hampshire, Maine, older individuals do much of the administrative work that younger people perform in Boston or New York. Somebody’s got to to do it. When those folks retire inevitably at some point, who will then?
I expect that many people will find that they have to move, with many risks.
Its a river upstream to sustainability, a river upstream to the formation of an equitable maintenance oriented economy that is stable and generationally integrated.
But, maybe that just confirms that those of us that are sensitive to sustainability, have to act creatively and assertively to make those institutions functional while we are still able to construct them.