When we studied geography in elementary and high school, it was presented to us mostly as the naming of physical places, natural, society.
- What is the tallest mountain in North America?
- What is the capital of New Hampshire?
- What is the population of San Francisco?
For those of us that studied some geography in college, the study was more social. Relevant questions might include:
- What proportion of the population of Holyoke, MA is speaks Spanish as its primary language?
- What proportion of the population of Greenfield, MA makes greater than $75,000/year?
The social geographic study was relevant to many subsequent career applications, marketing, politics (a form of marketing), activism.
In my undergraduate studies and later, I sought to understand what community/s I was a part of, how, and how does that constitute a marketplace/economy, and rational scope of governance.
I live in a physical geographic cusp region, Greenfield, MA. We can’t figure out if we are urban, a city in its own right, a supply and value-adding site of international trade through Boston and New York; or, if we are rural and primarily serving a locale.
The physical geography of New England influences our (Greenfield) character significantly. Further north into Vermont and New Hampshire (and locally), the mountains are defining obstacles. There is a great amount of interchange north and south along the river valley and highway arteries, and much less interchange east and west across the Berkshires for example.
Pittsfield is 45 miles away as the crow flies, but there is far far far less interchange between Pittsfield and Greenfield than between Springfield and Greenfield. I know people that commute the 60 miles from Greenfield to Hartford area. I don’t know anyone that commutes west 60 miles to Pittsfield.
South of us, physical geography is not as much of an obstacle. From Springfield, the hills are not as isolating, and there is a great deal of east-west traffic, even between Springfield and Worcester, or Springfield and Albany.
Interstate highways make that possible, but before there were highways, there was still much more interchange east and west there than east-west from Greenfield and north.
Markets and societies now have a permanent and fundamental new feature. The internet has created links between people far and wide. Some as natural extensions of other links: common religion, common profession, common hobbies. Other linkages are more random, independant of place or interest. The linkages are so thick that they constitute really a new geography.
I attended a small conference this weekend focusing on sustainable business and “resilience” in the Pioneer Valley (Springfield, Northampton, Amherst, Greenfield, MA area). Most of the attendees were entrepreneurs and consultants serving very local geographic markets, and interests.
There was some discussion on the different scale markets that individuals and organizations served. Most served local markets, some micro-regional markets (Pioneer Valley for example), some macro-regional markets (New England for example). A few, particularly those offering intellectual services, and more particularly software and data services, served various scales of networks in the cyber geography (not well mapped).
Much of the discussion of supporting institutions and efforts had difficulty addressing the differences in scale of marketplaces existing and served.
I think it is an important discussion that gives a great deal of meaning and strategic map to improving the health of various scales and settings of community.
Rather than a difficulty in identifying a “norm” of what marketplace one should serve, identification of scale enhances clarification of one’s existing and prospective customers and other stakeholders (finance, supply chain), and definitions of success.
I think those of us that are serial entrepreneurs (over and over again, successes and failures) need to remember that Enterprises serve needs and enjoyment. Our success depends on offering honest exchange that clearly adds value to another person or organization. The service is for others, not for us. We need to listen mostly.
Thereby creating sober livelihood and personal health, productivity, family health, tax revenues for community and state. And, creating value in customers/clients in fair exchange.
Read Full Post »