Are we making progress individually?
- Our family?
- Our community?
- Our region?
- Our planet?
How do we know?
In order to tell, to compare, to decide how to use scarce resources, we have to measure in some way, and every measurement is going to contain cultural biases, be incomplete and contain some emphasis that becomes self-fulfilling.
For those of us that accomplish more than we rebel, the phrase “what you measure is what gets done” applies.
So, what do we measure and how does it relate to making real wealth, a real good experience with the prospect of real good experience for others in the future?
I’ll be attending the “Slow Living Summit” in Brattleboro, VT this week – June 1, 2, 3 (http://www.strollingoftheheifers.com/slow-living-summit). Come.
I know quite a few of the presenters. Many are visionaries, and doing practical work, trying to cobble together a coherent effort to achieve a sustainable society. To work together rather than disparately, to make something real and dependable rather than utopian and speculative.
Much of it is against the grain of conventional urban/global economy.
(Geography affects our vision of utopian. Specifically, that north of Hartford, CT, on the Connecticut River there are distinct cultural shifts. Hartford and Springfield house the global insurance centers of the world, serving global literally. The global commercial market vision is the utopia. Springfield and Holyoke house the formerly regional industrial center of New England. When one reaches Brattleboro, the site of the “Slow Living Summit”, the inaccessibility of the stream watershed hollows define a world of rural self-dependance more than community inter-dependance, more than regional economy, or global economy. The shift in worldview in that short 80 mile stretch is distinct, profound, divisive.)
The ruralist consciousness of Brattleboro is the host of the Slow Living Summit. The global economy is what you read about in the New York Times and on cable television. Not surprising.The sustainable rural economy is the content of the summit, and is actually another vibrant source of future visions.
The concepts of living well in nature has gone far (actually cyclically given the degree of wealth and social complexity that Indian society was able to achieve). We have the integrated thinking of permaculture that integrates practical and efficient food and shelter services with aesthetics with personal liberty and with the ecological world beyond our immediate experience and affects.
The rural/urban dichotomy will be a conflict (or negligence) of the summit, inevitably. The rural sustainable solution is more anarchic. The urban sustainable solution is more designed.
That dichotomy will infuse the question of “how do we tell?”, as the question includes the assumptions of differing social values, and particularly which ones are relevant and/or controllable.
As the measure of our success is our experience, my feeling is that the metric of social welfare must be results based and not preference or strategically based.
In a nutshell, we can tell if we are making progress if we achieve:
1. Current survival and functional minimum necessities for all in the geographic scope that we are investigating. Food, shelter, water, warmth, clothing, health care, transportation, education.
2. Confident survival and safety in the foreseeable future
3. Interpersonal connection, love, friendship, family (society)
4. Work and service accomplishment and basis of earned respect
5. Spirituality in action, spirituality in contemplation/aesthetics
How do we know we are succeeding? What do we measure? How?